4.7 Article

Explicitly integrating parameter, input, and structure uncertainties into Bayesian Neural Networks for probabilistic hydrologic forecasting

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 409, 期 3-4, 页码 696-709

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.09.002

关键词

Bayesian Neural Networks; Evolutionary Monte Carlo; Hydrologic forecasting; Streamflow; Uncertainty

资金

  1. DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science) [DE-FC02-07ER64494]
  2. DOE BER Office of Science [KP1601050]
  3. DOE EERE [OBP 2046919145]
  4. National Science Foundation [DMS-0607755, CMMI-0926803]
  5. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-C1-016-04]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1007457] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estimating uncertainty of hydrologic forecasting is valuable to water resources and other relevant decision making processes. Recently, Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) have been proved powerful tools for quantifying uncertainty of streamflow forecasting. In this study, we propose a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) framework (BNN-PIS) to incorporate the uncertainties associated with parameters, inputs, and structures into BNNs. This framework allows the structure of the neural networks to change by removing or adding connections between neurons and enables scaling of input data by using rainfall multipliers. The results show that the new BNNs outperform BNNs that only consider uncertainties associated with parameters and model structures. Critical evaluation of posterior distribution of neural network weights, number of effective connections, rainfall multipliers, and hyper-parameters shows that the assumptions held in our BNNs are not well supported. Further understanding of characteristics of and interactions among different uncertainty sources is expected to enhance the application of neural networks for uncertainty analysis of hydrologic forecasting. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据