4.7 Article

Use of automated radon measurements for rapid assessment of groundwater flow into Florida streams

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 380, 期 3-4, 页码 298-304

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.005

关键词

Submarine Groundwater Discharge; Radon; Tracer; Florida

资金

  1. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) [GW270]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naturally occurring Rn-222 (radon; t(1/2) = 3.8 days) is a good natural tracer of groundwater discharge because it is conservative and typically 2-3 orders of magnitude higher in groundwater than surface waters. In addition, new technology has allowed rapid and inexpensive field measurements of radon-in-water. Results from the C-25 Canal, a man-made canal in east-central Florida thought to be dominated by groundwater inflows, display how one can quickly assess a water body for locations of groundwater inputs. Although only the eastern portion of the canal was surveyed, use of a few assumptions together with some continuous radon measurements allowed reasonable estimates of the groundwater inflows to be made. Groundwater discharge estimates of 327,000 m(3)/day and 331,000 m(3)/day were measured for two stations based on determining the groundwater fraction of the total stream flow. This fraction in each case was calculated by correcting radon concentrations for decay over transit times determined from concentration differences between the apparent focal point of groundwater discharge (with a concentration of 520 +/- 80 dpm/L) estimated to be similar to 17.7 km upstream from the downstream sample locations. During the same period, an average flow of 312,000 +/- 70.000 m(3)/day was determined from time-series measurements of radon at a fixed downstream location. Coincident current meter readings and a measured cross-section area allowed an independent assessment of the total stream discharge of 336,000 m(3)/day. The radon-derived estimates thus indicate that >90% of the total flow is groundwater derived, consistent with the known characteristics of this waterway. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据