4.7 Article

Artificial neural networks for estimating regional arsenic concentrations in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 388, 期 1-2, 页码 65-76

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.029

关键词

Arsenic; Artificial neural networks (ANNs); Over-fitting; Leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation; Modified performance function (MPF); Principal component analysis (PCA)

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC [NSC 95-2313-B-002-051-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High arsenic concentrations in groundwater have been detected in the south-western coastal area of Taiwan. In this study, artificial neural networks (ANNs) were investigated for their applicability to recovering the missing arsenic data and constructing the spatial distribution of arsenic concentration based on the arsenic concentration data of 28 groundwater observation wells Due to a limited number of data sets, several strategies were proposed to construct the backpropagation neural networks (BPNs) The leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation was adopted to diminish the bias in choosing validation data, and the modified performance function (MPF) was applied to reducing an over-fitting situation Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to transform the arsenic concentration of the regional wells into a limited number of main factors that were used as the input variables for the ANNs. Results showed that the 100 cross-validation was an effective tool for model selection, and the parameter, gamma, of MPF played an important role for reducing errors in the model training and validation processes and alleviating the problem of over-fitting. Although sparse data sets have been used to construct ANNs, the models still achieved acceptable performance. The predicted spatial distribution of the arsenic concentration can provide useful information to local residents when groundwater achieves high levels of arsenic concentrations in non-functioning groundwater monitoring wells (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据