4.7 Article

Empirical sediment transport function predicting seepage erosion undercutting for cohesive bank failure prediction

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 377, 期 1-2, 页码 155-164

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.020

关键词

Seepage; Ground water flow; Erosion; Sediment transport; Bank stability

资金

  1. The Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES)
  2. US Department of Agriculture (USDA) [2005-35102-17209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seepage erosion is an important factor in hillslope instability and failure. However, predicting erosion by subsurface flow or seepage and incorporating its effects into stability models remains a challenge Limitations exist with all existing seepage erosion sediment transport functions, including neglecting the three-dimensional geometry of the seepage undercut and the cohesive nature of soils. The objective was to develop an empirical sediment transport function that can predict seepage erosion and undercutting with time based on three-dimensional soil block experiments covering a wide range of hydraulic, soil type, slope and bulk density combinations. The transport function was represented by an excess gradient equation (R-2 = 0.54). The critical gradient was predicted by the soil cohesion based on laboratory experiments. Using a three-dimensional Gaussian function, the geometric relationships between the maximum distance and lateral and vertical dimensions of the undercut were then derived. The proposed empirical relationships reasonably predicted the observed volume per unit area of undercut, erosion rate, and time at which a given amount of undercut developed. The flow gradient can be used with the derived sediment transport function, the first ever relationship proposed for predicting the dimensions and the geometry of the undercut, to predict the impact of seepage erosion undercutting on hillslope stability Users only need to input the seepage layer's cohesion, bulk density, and the hydraulic gradient over time in the near-bank ground water system (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据