4.7 Article

Assessment by multivariate analysis of groundwater-surface water interactions in urbanized Mediterranean streams

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 352, 期 3-4, 页码 355-366

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.01.014

关键词

groundwater-surface water interactions; hydrochemistry; principal component analysis; cluster analysis; environmental pressures; Mediterranean streams

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Streams in Mediterranean areas are characterized by a variable discharge regime with annual floods and droughts. Natural flow perturbations result in permanent and temporary rivers and, as a consequence, unique ecosystems. Human pressures such as treated and non-treated waste water discharge impact severely on these streams, since waste water dilution depends on river flow dynamics. Furthermore, their hydrological status worsens with the capture of stream discharge by surface or groundwater exploitation. Multivariate analysis has been widely used to analyze large sets of variables in environmental studies. In the present work, a hydrological study reinforced by principal component analysis (PCA), followed by cluster analysis of the PCA results, has been used to determine surface water origin and its interactions with groundwater in Mediterranean streams. The results show that hydrological observations are supported by PCA and cluster analysis. Additionally, this joint analysis makes it possible to observe the significance of the interaction between streams and aquifers in anthropized Mediterranean Basins. Groundwater exploitation can seriously impact on permanent streams, reducing their dilution capacity, and can even cause the capture of the whole stream discharge. Furthermore, good quality water contributions allow continuous stream flows and better waste water dilutions all year long. Finally, the results show that the presence and quality of surface water in temporary reaches during dry periods directly depends on groundwater contributions. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据