4.6 Article

Vacuum deposited ternary mixture organic solar cells

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 229-239

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.12.021

关键词

Organic solar cell; Ternary; Vacuum deposition; Small molecule; Transient photocurrent

资金

  1. Xerox Research Centre of Canada (XRCC)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship
  4. Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  5. WIN Nanofellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ternary mixtures of photo-active organic materials are an intuitive approach to achieve enhanced photocurrent in organic solar cells (OSCs). In this work, we study ternary mixtures of vacuum deposited small molecules, complementing the recent surge of interest in solution processed ternary OSCs. The mixed layer composition is systematically varied to study all possible film configurations, and the resulting OSCs are successful in harvesting photocurrent from all three components to grant broad spectral photoresponse. However, the performance of the ternary OSC is generally less than the binary OSC, largely due to reduced fill factors. By examining ternary OSC transient photocurrents and multi-donor planar heterojunction devices, we demonstrate that the ternary OSC is strongly affected by the energy levels of its constituent materials, with small differences in the two donor materials' highest occupied molecular orbitals degrading hole transport. The results stress the importance of fine molecular engineering for ternary OSCs, and further hint that the enhancements commonly observed in solution processed ternary OSCs may in part be associated with morphological variations that are not present in vacuum deposited OSCs. The research verifies that, by designing small molecules with specific energy levels, ternary OSCs provide an alternative pathway to low cost, high efficiency photovoltaics in lieu of more complicated device architectures. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据