4.4 Article

Estimation of Continuous Streamflow in Ontario Ungauged Basins: Comparison of Regionalization Methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 447-459

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000338

关键词

Continuous streamflow; Ungauged basins; Coupled regionalization; Physical similarity; Multiple linear regression; Spatial proximity; Regionalization; Uncertainty analysis

资金

  1. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regionalization, a process of transferring hydrological information [i.e., parameters of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model, namely, the McMaster University-Hydrologiska Byrans Vattenbalansavdelning (MAC-HBV)] from gauged to ungauged basins, was applied to estimate continuous flows in ungauged basins across Ontario, Canada. To identify appropriate regionalization methods, different regionalization methods were applied, including the spatial proximity [i.e., kriging, inverse distance weighted (IDW), and mean parameters], physical similarity, and regression-based approaches. Furthermore, an approach coupling the spatial-proximity (IDW) method and the physical similarity approach is proposed. The analysis results show that the coupled regionalization approach as well as the IDW and kriging produce better model performances than the remaining three. Further investigations show that the coupled-regionalization approach provides slightly better performances than the other two spatial proximity methods. In addition, a modified Monte Carlo simulation method is used to assess the estimated flow confidence intervals. The prediction confidence intervals provide additional information on the range of variability of the simulated continuous streamflow in the ungauged basins, and this can be particularly useful for decision making, such as environmental flow determination in ungauged basins. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000338. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据