4.8 Article

Decompression wave speed in CO2 mixtures: CFD modelling with the GERG-2008 equation of state

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 20-32

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.054

关键词

CO2 pipeline; Decompression wave speed; Equation of state; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Fracture propagation arrest

资金

  1. Energy Pipelines CRC - Australian Government's Cooperative Research Centre Program
  2. Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism (DRET)
  3. APIA RSC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of CO2 pipelines for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) raises new questions regarding the control of ductile fracture propagation and fracture arrest toughness criteria. The decompression behaviour in the fluid must be determined accurately in order to estimate the proper pipe toughness. However, anthropogenic CO2 may contain impurities that can modify the fluid decompression characteristics quite significantly. To determine the decompression wave speed in CO2 mixtures, the thermodynamic properties of these mixtures must be determined by using an accurate equation of state. In this paper we present a new decompression model developed using the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) package ANSYS Fluent. The GERG-2008 Equation of State (EOS) was implemented into this model through User Defined Functions (UDF) to predict the thermodynamic properties of CO2 mixtures. The model predictions were in good agreement with the experimental data of two 'shock tube' tests. A range of representative CO2 mixtures was examined in terms of the changes in fluid properties from the initial conditions, with time and distance, immediately after a sudden pipeline opening at one end. Phase changes that may occur within the fluid due to condensation of 'impurities' in the fluid were also investigated. Simulations were also conducted to examine how the initial temperature and impurities would affect the decompression wave speed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据