4.5 Article

Improved annual rainfall-runoff forecasting using PSO-SVM model based on EEMD

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 1377-1390

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2013.134

关键词

annual rainfall-runoff; artificial neural networks; ensemble empirical mode decomposition; forecasting; particle swarm optimization; support vector machine

资金

  1. Key Project of Science Technique Research of Henan Educational Committee [12A570005]
  2. foundation for University Backbone Teacher of Henan Province [2012GGJS-099]
  3. Central Research Grant of Hong Kong Polytechnic University [4-ZZAD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rainfall-runoff simulation and prediction in watersheds is one of the most important tasks in water resources management. In this research, an adaptive data analysis methodology, ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), is presented for decomposing annual rainfall series in a rainfall-runoff model based on a support vector machine (SVM). In addition, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) is used to determine free parameters of SVM. The study data from a large size catchment of the Yellow River in China are used to illustrate the performance of the proposed model. In order to measure the forecasting capability of the model, an ordinary least-squares (OLS) regression and a typical three-layer feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) are employed as the benchmark model. The performance of the models was tested using the root mean squared error (RMSE), the average absolute relative error (AARE), the coefficient of correlation (R) and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE). The PSO SVM EEMD model improved ANN model forecasting (65.99%) and OLS regression (64.40%), and reduced RMSE (67.7%) and AARE (65.38%) values. Improvements of the forecasting results regarding the R and NSE are 8.43%, 18.89% and 182.7%, 164.2%, respectively. Consequently, the presented methodology in this research can enhance significantly rainfall-runoff forecasting at the studied station.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据