4.5 Article

A well-balanced positivity preserving two-dimensional shallow flow model with wetting and drying fronts over irregular topography

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 618-631

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s42241-018-0069-7

关键词

Shallow water equations; central upwind scheme; well-balanced; wetting and drying; positivity preserving; second order accuracy

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LR16E090001]
  2. Research Funding of Shenzhen City [JCYJ20160425164642646]
  3. Zhejiang Province Science and Technology Research Funding [2015C03015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an improved well-balanced Godunov-type 2-D finite volume model with structured grids to simulate shallow flows with wetting and drying fronts over an irregular topography. The intercell flux is computed using a central upwind scheme, which is a Riemann-problem-solver-free method for hyperbolic conservation laws. The nonnegative reconstruction method for the water depth is implemented to resolve the stationary or wet/dry fronts. The bed slope source term is discretized using a central difference method to capture the static flow state over the irregular topography. Second-order accuracy in space is achieved by using the slope limited linear reconstruction method. With the proposed method, the model can avoid the partially wetting/drying cell problem and maintain the mass conservation. The proposed model is tested and verified against three theoretical benchmark tests and two experimental dam break flows. Further, the model is applied to predict the maximum water level and the flood arrival time at different gauge points for the Malpasset dam break event. The predictions agree well with the numerical results and the measurement data published in literature, which demonstrates that with the present model, a well-balanced state can be achieved and the water depth can be nonnegative when the Courant number is kept less than 0.25.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据