4.8 Article

Experimental study of the heat transfer through a vertical stack of rectangular cavities filled with phase change materials

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 192-205

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.034

关键词

Energy storage; Phase change material; Heat transfer; Rectangular cavity; Natural convection; Subcooling

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BD/51640/2011]
  2. project Energy and Mobility for Sustainable Regions - EMSURE [CENTRO-07-0224-FEDER-002004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The heat transfer through a vertical stack of rectangular cavities filled with phase change materials (PCMs) is experimentally analysed in terms of both melting and solidification processes. This paper provides data that are useful for benchmarking and validation of numerical models that account for natural convection in the molten PCM. Two different PCMs are investigated: the free-form PCM-Rubitherm (R) RT 28 HC; and the microencapsulated PCM-Micronal (R) DS 5001 X. In terms of practical applications, the main goal is to discuss which PCM type is better for building applications. The time required for the melting and solidification fronts to reach the mid-plane of the cavities is presented as a function of the PCM type. During charging, the control-temperature value on the hot surface of the test-sample and the period of thermal-regulation are investigated. It is shown that the free PCM is preferable for the thermal control of vertical systems as both parameters are improved due to natural convection. The use of microencapsulated PCMs allows accelerating the charging process with almost no thermal stratification. However, in this case the control-temperature effect and the thermal-regulation period are both reduced. Regarding the discharging process, subcooling plays an important role during the solidification of the free PCM and its effect cannot be neglected when modelling. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据