4.3 Article

Revisiting turbulence in smooth uniform open channel flow

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 36-48

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2008.9521938

关键词

open channel flow; turbulence; quadrant analysis; channel aspect ratio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reexamines the mean velocity scaling as well as higher order turbulent moments in a uniform smooth open channel flow with three different aspect ratios. In the overlap region, the velocity profiles follow the classical logarithmic law. In the outer region, the mean velocity data at various aspect ratios collapse on to each other only when the length scale is suitably modified. This length scale is defined on the basis of a region of constant turbulence intensity close to the free surface and is equal to the depth of flow at large aspect ratios. The proposed new length scaling also provides for a positive value of the wake parameter. Furthermore, turbulence distributions including that of the Reynolds shear stress, and triple correlations ((u(2)v) over bar and (uv(2)) over bar) collapse onto a single line making them nearly independent of aspect ratio. Quadrant decomposition of the velocity data was used to quantify the differences in the turbulence structure at the three channel aspect ratios. The quadrant analysis shows that the turbulence in open channel is similar to that in both turbulent boundary layers and flow in two-dimensional channels when all turbulent events are included. When only the extreme events are considered, differences between open channel flow and turbulent boundary layers become significant. The conditional quadrant analysis reveals that the violent ejections do penetrate into the flow and they are responsible for producing large portion of the Reynolds shear stress. Some effects of aspect ratio are revealed when the ratio of the ejection to sweep events are calculated. The turbulent events with the higher aspect ratios tend to be closer to the two-dimensional channel data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据