4.6 Article

The effect of N-methylation of amino acids (Ac-X-OMe) on solubility and conformation: a DFT study

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 13, 期 39, 页码 9993-10006

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ob01565k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (South Africa)
  2. Asphen Pharmacare
  3. UKZN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-Methylation has a significant impact on improving the oral bioavailability, lipophilicity and aqueous solubility of peptide-based lead drug structures. The selected mono-amino acid derivatives Ac-X-OMe, where X = Gly, Val, Leu, Ile, Phe, Met, Cys, Ser, Asp and His as well as their corresponding N-methylated analogues were studied. The clog P values of all N-methylated peptides are greater than those of native compounds. Quantum chemical calculations were performed to estimate the aqueous solubility of these lipophilic compounds using density functional theory (DFT). To confirm the contribution of dispersion forces on quantum chemical data, the long-range corrected (LC) hybrid density functional (omega B97X-D) was also probed for some amino acid derivatives. The omega B97X functional gave similar results. Our results reveal that after mono N-methylation of the peptide backbone, Delta G(solv) becomes more negative (more water soluble) while polarizability and dipole moment are also increased. Natural atomic charges derived by natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis of N, C, and O atoms involved in amide functional group become more positive/(less negative) after N-methylation. All N-methylated amino acids have higher EHOMO (less negative) in comparison with the amino acid analogues, and in all cases N-methylation decreases EHOMO-LUMO. The calculated amide cis/trans activation energies (E-A) of all the N-methylated amino acid derivatives were lower than that of native species. N-methylation of these compounds leads to an increase in lipophilicity, aqueous solubility, polarization, dipole moment and lowering of the cis/trans amide energy barrier (E-A).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据