4.2 Article

Behavioural and psychosocial correlates of nondipping blood pressure pattern among middle-aged men and women at work

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 381-387

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2011.42

关键词

nondipping; blood pressure; psychosocial

资金

  1. Belgian Federal Public Service Employment, Labour and Social Dialogue
  2. European Social Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms of nondipping blood pressure (BP) pattern are not completely understood. Especially the role of psychosocial correlates remains unclear. The aim was to assess the association between nondipping BP pattern, behavioural and psychosocial factors in a sample of working men and women. The study sample included 167 working men and women aged 40-64 years from the BELSTRESS cohort. Socio-demographic, behavioural and psychosocial factors were assessed by self-administered questionnaires. Participants were medically examined and underwent an ambulatory BP monitoring during 24 h. Nondipping was defined when the average nocturnal decline in BP was <10%. The prevalence of nondipping for both systolic and diastolic BP was 7.8%. Nondipping was not significantly related to smoking, alcohol consumption and leisure time physical activity. A crude significant association was observed between nondipping and sleep problems. After adjusting for gender, education and body mass index, the risk for nondipping was associated with job strain, living alone, being unsatisfied about the contact with one's children, depressive symptoms and vital exhaustion. Nondipping BP pattern was consistently related to psychosocial factors in this study: positive associations were observed with measures of job strain, poor private life support (living alone and being unsatisfied about the contact with one's children) and mental health problems (depressive symptoms and vital exhaustion). Journal of Human Hypertension (2012) 26, 381-387; doi:10.1038/jhh.2011.42; published online 5 May 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据