4.2 Article

Aliskiren for Geriatric Lowering of Systolic Hypertension: a randomized controlled trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 600-608

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2009.107

关键词

aliskiren; blood pressure; combination therapy; direct renin inhibition; ramipril

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  3. Novartis
  4. Sanofi-Aventis
  5. Roche
  6. Merck
  7. Schering-Plough
  8. Pfizer
  9. Forest Laboratories

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficacy and safety of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren was compared with ramipril for treatment of essential systolic hypertension in elderly patients. A 36-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, optional-titration study was performed in 901 patients (aliskiren, n = 457; ramipril, n = 444) >= 65 years of age with systolic blood pressure (SBP) >= 140 mm Hg. Aliskiren 150-300 mg per day or ramipril 5-10 mg per day for was administered for 12 weeks with optional add-on therapy of hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg per day) at week 12 and amlodipine (5-10 mg per day) at week 22. The primary end point was non-inferiority of aliskiren vs ramipril monotherapy for change from baseline in mean sitting SBP (msSBP) at week 12. Decreases from baseline msSBP and mean sitting diastolic BP with aliskiren monotherapy (14.0 and -5.1 mm Hg, respectively) were non-inferior (P<0.001 for both values) and superior to ramipril monotherapy (-11.6, -3.6 mm Hg; P = 0.02, P<0.01, respectively). More patients achieved BP control with aliskiren (42%) than ramipril (33%; P<0.01). At week 36, fewer patients receiving aliskiren-based therapy required add-on treatment with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine (P = 0.01 and 0.048, respectively). Tolerability was similar, but more patients receiving ramipril reported cough (P<0.001). In elderly patients with systolic hypertension, aliskiren proved to be more effective and better overall anti-hypertensive therapy compared to ramipril. Journal of Human Hypertension (2010) 24, 600-608; doi:10.1038/jhh.2009.107; published online 24 December 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据