4.2 Article

Sympathetic nerve hyperactivity of essential hypertension is lower in postmenopausal women than men

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 544-549

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2008.31

关键词

gender; menopause; sympathetic nervous system

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [fs/04/085] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sympathetic activation has been associated with the development and complications of hypertension. While the prevalence of hypertension and its cardiovascular risks in women are found to be less than in men and tend to become similar to men after the menopause, there have been no data on the level of sympathetic activation in postmenopausal women relative to men. Therefore, we planned to find out whether muscle sympathetic nerve hyperactivity of essential hypertension (EHT) in postmenopausal women is different from that in matched men. We quantified muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) as mean frequency of single units (s-MSNA) and multiunit bursts (b-MSNA) in 21 postmenopausal women with EHT (W-EHT) relative to 21 matched men with EHT (M-EHT), in comparison to two control groups of 21 normal women (W-NC) and 21 men (M-NC), respectively. The EHT groups had greater MSNA indices than NC groups. W-EHT had lower (P<0.05) s-MSNA (63 +/- 22.7 impulses per 100 cardiac beats) than M-EHT (78 +/- 11.2 impulses per 100 cardiac beats). W-NC had lower (P<0.05) s-MSNA (53 +/- 12.4 impulses per 100 cardiac beats) than M- NC (65 +/- 16.3 impulses per 100 cardiac beats). Similar results were obtained for b-MSNA. Postmenopausal women with EHT had lower level of central sympathetic hyperactivity than men. Similarly, normal postmenopausal women had lower MSNA than men. These findings suggest that postmenopausal women continue to have a lower sympathetic nerve activity than men even after the development of EHT, and that this could have implications for gender-specific management of hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据