4.4 Review

The discovery of human genetic variations and their use as disease markers: past, present and future

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 55, 期 7, 页码 403-415

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2010.55

关键词

copy number variations; genome-wide association studies; human genetic variations; indels; loss of heterozygosity; restriction fragment length polymorphisms; single nucleotide polymorphisms; tandem repeats

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The field of human genetic variations has progressed rapidly over the past few years. It has added much information and deepened our knowledge and understanding of the diversity of genetic variations in the human genome. This significant progress has been driven mainly by the developments of microarray and next generation sequencing technologies. The array-based methods have been widely used for large-scale copy number variation (CNV) detection in the human genome. The arrival of next generation sequencing technologies, which enabled the completion of several whole genome resequencing studies, has also resulted in a massive discovery of genetic variations. These studies have identified several hundred thousand short indels and a total of thousands of CNVs and other structural variations in the human genome. The discovery of these 'newer' types of genetic variations, indels, CNVs and copy neutral variations (inversions and translocations) has also widened the scope of genetic markers in human genetic and disease gene mapping studies. The aim of this review article is to summarize the latest developments in the discovery of human genetic variations and address the issue of inadequate coverage of genetic variations in the current genome-wide association studies, which mainly focuses on common SNPs. Finally, we also discuss the future directions in the field and their impacts on next generation genome-wide association studies. Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 55, 403-415; doi:10.1038/jhg.2010.55; published online 20 May 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据