4.4 Article

Meiotic behavior of three D;G Robertsonian translocations: segregation and interchromosomal effect

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 55, 期 8, 页码 541-545

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2010.67

关键词

interchromosomal effect; meiotic segregation; Robertsonian translocations; sperm FISH studies

资金

  1. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca de la Generalitat de Catalunya, SPAIN [2009 SGR-282]
  2. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain [180034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Robertsonian translocations are one of the most frequent reorganizations in humans. Their segregational behavior and their implication in the occurrence of interchromosomal effects (ICEs) has been an important topic of research for the past 10 years. Most of the cases analyzed correspond to rearrangements with chromosomes from the D-group (chromosomes 13, 14 and 15), whereas some rare Robertsonian translocations are scarcely found in the literature, mainly those with both chromosomes from the G-group (chromosomes 21 and 22) and those involving chromosomes from both groups (D;G translocations). Results supporting/rejecting the existence of the ICE phenomenon have been reported, showing the need for more studies to characterize its distribution. In this study, sperm fluorescent in situ hybridization studies have been performed in three D;G Robertsonian translocation carriers: two men with the translocation t(14;21) and a third individual with the rare t(13;22) reorganization. Segregation and ICE results have been considered in relation to their cytogenetic features and all previously published data. The compiled information discards a particular segregation behavior related to the chromosomes involved. In contrast with this segregational homogeneity, heterogeneous ICE results were observed, indicating a significant but random distribution of such phenomenon. Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 55, 541-545; doi:10.1038/jhg.2010.67; published online 17 June 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据