4.4 Article

Monozygotic female twins discordant for Silver-Russell syndrome and hypomethylation of the H19-DMR

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 53, 期 10, 页码 950-955

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1007/s10038-008-0329-4

关键词

Silver-Russell syndrome; monozygotic twin; discordance; methylation; H19-DMR; X-inactivation; DNMT1

资金

  1. Child Health and Development [20C-2]
  2. Research on Children and Families [H18-005]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare [16086215, 19390290]
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [19790752]
  5. Kawano Masanori Memorial Foundation for Promotion of Pediatrics
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16086215, 19790752, 19390290] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) is characterized by growth failure and dysmorphic features, and is frequently caused by hypomethylation of the paternally derived H19-DMR (epimutation). We observed 5 8/12-year-old female twins discordant for SRS. One twin exhibited SRS-compatible features, such as pre- and postnatal growth failure, relative macrocephaly, triangular face, left hemihypotrophy, and bilateral fifth finger clinodactyly, whereas the other twin showed apparently normal phenotype. Microsatellite analysis for 26 loci on multiple chromosomes showed monozygosity. Methylation analysis for the H19-DMR indicated epimutation in roughly half of cells in the affected twin and normal patterns in the unaffected twin and the parents. X-inactivation analysis revealed random X-inactivation with a nearly identical pattern between the twins. The discordant methylation pattern of the H19-DMR may primarily be due to a failure to maintain the DNA methyltransferase-1-dependent methylation imprint around the pre-implantation S phase, because such failure would result in the production of two different cell clones, one with normally methylated DMR and the other with demethylated DMR, leading to the separation of cells with different characters and resultant twinning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据