4.3 Article

Late Middle Pleistocene hominin teeth from Panxian Dadong, South China

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION
卷 64, 期 5, 页码 337-355

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.10.012

关键词

Teeth; Archaic Homo sapiens; Early modern humans; Panxian Dadong; China

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZZD-EW-03, XDA05130101]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41272034]
  3. US National Science Foundation [SBR-9727688]
  4. Henry Luce Foundation
  5. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  6. L.S.B. Leakey Foundation
  7. National Geographic Society
  8. Charles P. Taft Fund of the University of Cincinnati
  9. University of Cincinnati University Research Council
  10. California State University, Stanislaus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hominin teeth and evidence of hominin activities recovered from 1991 to 2005 at the Panxian Dadong site in South China are dated to the late Middle Pleistocene (MIS 8-6 or ca. 130-300 ka), a period for which very little is known about the morphology of Asian populations. The present study provides the first detailed morphometric description and comparisons of four hominin teeth (I-1, C-1, P-3 and P-3) from this site. Our study shows that the Panxian Dadong teeth combine archaic and derived features that align them with Middle and Upper Pleistocene fossils from East and West Asia and Europe. These teeth do not display any typical Neanderthal features and they are generally more derived than other contemporaneous populations from Asia and Africa. However, the derived traits are not diagnostic enough to specifically link the Panxian Dadong teeth to Homo sapiens, a common problem when analyzing the. Middle Pleistocene dental record from Africa and Asia. These findings are contextualized in the discussion of the evolutionary course of Asian. Middle Pleistocene hominins, and they highlight the necessity of incorporating the Asian fossil record in the still open debate about the origin of H. sapiens. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据