3.9 Article

Promotion of chondrogenesis of marrow stromal stem cells by TGF-β3 fusion protein in vitro

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11596-013-1182-z

关键词

fusion protein; marrow stromal cells; directional differentiation; transforming growth factor-beta 3; cartilage injury

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81101376]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate the repair of the osteoarthritis(OA)-induced cartilage injury by transfecting the new TGF-beta 3 fusion protein (LAP-MMP-mTGF-beta 3) with targeted therapy function into the bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in rats. The recombinant of pIRES-EGFP-MMP was constructed by combination of DNA encoding MMP enzyme cutting site and eukaryotic expression vector pIRES-EGFP. LAP and mTGF-beta 3 fragments were obtained from rat embryos by RT-PCR and inserted into the upstream and downstream of MMP from pIRES-EGFP-MMP respectively, so as to construct the recombinant plasmid of pIRES-EGFP-LAP-MMP-mTGF-beta 3. pIRES-EGFP-LAP-MMP-mTGF-beta 3 was transfected into rat MSCs. The genetically modified MSCs were cultured in medium with MMP-1 or not. The transfected MSCs were transplanted in the rat OA models. The OA animal models were surgically induced by anterior cruciate ligament transaction (ACLT). The pathological changes were observed under a microscope by HE staining, Alcian blue, Safranin-fast Green and graded by Mankin's scale. pIRES-EGFP-LAP-MMP-mTGF-beta 3 was successfully constructed by means of enzyme cutting and sequencing, and the mTGF-beta 3 fusion protein (39 kD) was certified by Western blotting. Those genetically modified MSCs could differentiate into chondrocytes induced by MMP and secrete the relevant-matrix. The transfected MSCs could promote chondrogenesis and matrix production in rat OA models in vivo. It was concluded that a new fusion protein LAP-MMP-mTGF-beta 3 was constructed successfully by gene engineering, and could be used to repair the OA-induced cartilage injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据