4.5 Article

Duration of norovirus excretion and the longitudinal course of viral load in norovirus-infected elderly patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
卷 75, 期 1, 页码 42-46

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.12.016

关键词

Elderly; Excretion; Norovirus; Viral load; Viral shedding

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Japan [H18-choju-006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To prevent dissemination of norovirus in semiclosed environments such as aged-care facilities, it is important to know the period of infectivity in norovirus-infected individuals. We recruited 13 elderly patients aged 60-98 years with norovirus gastroenteritis (11 residents in aged-care facilities and two healthy adults) for this study, and measured the viral loads for norovirus in a total of 63 follow-up faecal samples using a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. The average period of norovirus excretion was 14.3 days (range: 9-32 days; median: 13 days). All of the follow-up samples collected between 7 and 10 days after the onset of symptoms tested positive. Viral loads in samples collected between 14 and 18 days after the onset of symptoms were divided into three groups: those testing negative, those with <10(4) copies/g stool, and those with >10(4) copies/g stool. Stools from the group with <10(4) copies/g stool were found to be negative for norovirus up to 21-24 days after the onset of symptoms; however, the group with >10(4) copies/g stool showed prolonged norovirus excretion (up to 32 days) in stools. Although the period of infectivity of excreted viruses has not yet been clarified, these results suggest that careful attention should be taken for at least 14 days after the onset of symptoms and that the measurement of viral load in stools around 16 days after onset might be a useful method for following the course of viral shedding for each patient infected with norovirus. (C) 2009 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据