4.5 Article

Eradication of an extensive outbreak in a neonatal unit caused by two sequential Klebsiella pneumoniae clones harbouring related plasmids encoding an extended-spectrum β-lactamase

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
卷 73, 期 2, 页码 157-163

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.06.013

关键词

Antimicrobial resistance; Genotyping; Horizontal gene transfer; Nosocomial infection

资金

  1. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consurno
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain [P1070190]
  3. Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases [D06/0008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Outbreaks caused by extended-spectrum beta-tactamase (ESBL)producing Klebsiella pneumoniae are difficult to control and closure of an affected unit is sometimes necessary. We describe an outbreak of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae in a 28-bed neonatal unit that began in August 2005 and tasted for seven months. Weekly rectal swabs were taken from all babies admitted throughout the study period. Review of all procedures, contact precautions, thorough environmental. cleaning and restriction of cephalosporin use were implemented. ESBL production was investigated according to CLSI recommendations, and characterised by isoelectric focusing and sequencing. Typing of isolates was assessed by pulsed-field get electrophoresis. Plasmids were also studied. During the outbreak, 32% of 503 admitted babies became colonised and nine babies developed bacteraemia; at[ the babies recovered. The outbreak was finally terminated in February 2006. Two distinct clones were observed, the first circulating between August and October 2005, and the second between October 2005 and February 2006. Both of these clones carried the non-ESBL SHV-11 and TEM-4 ESBL. Plasmids harbouring TEM-4 from both clones were similar and molecular analysis suggested horizontal dissemination of a single plasmid between the two clones. (C) 2009 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据