4.2 Article

MicroCT versus sTSLIM 3D Imaging of the Mouse Cochlea

期刊

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 5, 页码 382-395

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1369/0022155413478613

关键词

scanning thin-sheet laser imaging microscopy; light-sheet fluorescence microscopy; orthogonal-plane fluorescence optical sectioning microscopy; micro-computed tomography; mouse cochlea

资金

  1. Research Foundation-Flanders
  2. VOCATIO foundation
  3. NIDCD [RO1DC007588-04]
  4. ARRA [RO1DC007588-03S1]
  5. Capita Foundation
  6. Lions Hearing Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We made a qualitative and quantitative comparison between a state-of-the-art implementation of micro-Computed Tomography (microCT) and the scanning Thin-Sheet Laser Imaging Microscopy (sTSLIM) method, applied to mouse cochleae. Both imaging methods are non-destructive and perform optical sectioning, respectively, with X-rays and laser light. MicroCT can be used on fresh or fixed tissue samples and is primarily designed to image bone rather than soft tissues. It requires complex back-projection algorithms to produce a two-dimensional image, and it is an expensive instrument. sTSLIM requires that a specimen be chemically fixed, decalcified, and cleared; but it produces high-resolution images of soft and bony tissues with minimum image postprocessing and is less expensive than microCT. In this article, we discuss the merits and disadvantages of each method individually and when combined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据