4.2 Article

A Correlative Method for Imaging Identical Regions of Samples by Micro-CT, Light Microscopy, and Electron Microscopy: Imaging Adipose Tissue in a Model System

期刊

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 263-271

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1369/0022155412473757

关键词

micro-CT; correlative microscopy; light microscopy; electron microscopy; adipose tissue; fat

资金

  1. Shriners Hospitals for Children
  2. National Institutes of Health [P01 AR049698]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SE 1115/1-2]
  4. [SFB829]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a method in which a precise region of interest within an intact organism is spatially mapped in three dimensions by non-invasive micro-computed X-ray tomography (micro-CT), then further evaluated by light microscopy (LM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Tissues are prepared as if for TEM including osmium fixation, which imparts soft tissue contrast in the micro-CT due to its strong X-ray attenuation. This method may therefore be applied to embedded, archived TEM samples. Upon selection of a two-dimensional (2-D) projection from a region of interest (ROI) within the three-dimensional volume, the epoxy-embedded sample is oriented for microtomy so that the sectioning plane is aligned with the micro-CT projection. Registration is verified by overlaying LM images with 2-D micro-CT projections. Structures that are poorly resolved in the micro-CT may be evaluated at TEM resolution by observing the next serial ultrathin section, thereby accessing the same ROI by all three imaging techniques. We compare white adipose tissue within the forelimbs of mice harboring a lipid-altering mutation with their littermate controls. We demonstrate that individual osmium-stained lipid droplets as small as 15 mu m and separated by as little as 35 mu m may be discerned as separate entities in the micro-CT, validating this to be a high-resolution, non-destructive technique for evaluation of fat content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据