4.2 Article

Reduction of High Background Staining by Heating Unfixed Mouse Skeletal Muscle Tissue Sections Allows for Detection of Thermostable Antigens With Murine Monoclonal Antibodies

期刊

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 56, 期 11, 页码 969-975

出版社

HISTOCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1369/jhc.2008.950105

关键词

background reduction; boiling; double immunofluorescence; dystrophin; homologous tissue; immunohistochemistry; monoclonal mouse antibodies

资金

  1. Bundesministerium for Bildung und Forschung [FKZ 01 GN 0122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antigen detection with indirect immunohistochemical methods is hampered by high background staining if the primary antibody is from the same species as the examined tissue. This high background can be eliminated in unfixed cryostat sections of mouse skeletal muscle by boiling sections in PBS, and several proteins including even the low abundant dystrophin protein can then be easily detected with murine monoclonal antibodies. However, not all antigens withstand the boiling procedure. Immunoreactivity of some of these antigens can be restored by subsequent washing in Triton X-100, whereas immunoreactivity of other proteins is not restored by this detergent treatment. When such thermolabile proteins are labeled with polyclonal primary antibodies followed by dichlorotriazinylaminofluorescein-conjugated secondary antibodies and boiled, the fluorescence signal persists, and sections can then be processed with a monoclonal antibody for double immunostaining of a protein unaffected by boiling. This stability of certain fluorochromes on heating can also be exploited for double immunofluorescence labeling of two different thermostable proteins with murine monoclonal antibodies as well as for combination with Y-chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization. Our method should extend the range of monoclonal antibodies applicable to tissues derived from the same species as the monoclonal antibodies. (J Histochem Cytochem 56:969-975, 2008)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据