4.3 Article

Heterozygote Advantage in a Finite Population: Black Color in Wolves

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEREDITY
卷 105, 期 4, 页码 457-465

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esu024

关键词

defensin; genetic drift; heterozygote advantage; polymorphism; predation

资金

  1. Ullman Professorship
  2. National Science Foundation [DEB-0613730, DEB-1021397, DEB-1245373]
  3. Yellowstone National Park
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1245373] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a striking color polymorphism for wolves in the Yellowstone National Park where approximately half the wolves are black. The genetic basis for this polymorphism is known, and fitnesses of the genotypes are estimated. These estimates suggest that there is strong heterozygote advantage but substantial asymmetry in the fitness differences of the 2 homozygotes. Theoretically, such fitnesses in a finite population are thought to reduce genetic variation at least as fast as if there were no selection at all. Because the color polymorphism has remained at about the same frequency for 17 years, about 4 generations, we investigated whether this was consistent with the theoretical predictions. Counter to this general expectation of loss, given the initial frequency of black wolves, the theoretical expectation in this case was found to be that the frequency would only decline slowly over time. For example, if the effective population size is 20, then the expected black allele frequency after 4 generations would be 0.191, somewhat less than the observed value of 0.237. However, nearly 30% of the time the expected frequency is 0.25 or greater, consistent with the contemporary observed frequency. In other words and in contrast to general theoretical predictions, because of the short period of time in evolutionary terms and the relatively weak selection at low frequencies, the observed variation and the predicted theoretical variation are not inconsistent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据