4.8 Article

Carbon dioxide adsorption thermodynamics and mechanisms on MCM-41 supported polyethylenimine prepared by wet impregnation method

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 221-228

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.072

关键词

Molecular basket sorbent; CO2 adsorption; Molecular simulation; Monte Carlo; MCM-41; Polyethylenimine

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51106185]
  2. NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund Project [U1034005]
  3. Nature Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2012040007694]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [12lgpy23]
  5. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB720404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amine-functionalized sorbents prepared by wet impregnation method shows great promises for CO2 capture from real flue gas in power plants. The objective of this work is to understand CO2 adsorption thermodynamics and mechanisms at varied polyethylenimine (PEI) loadings on mesoporous MCM-41 by wet impregnation method using a computational approach for the first time. The structures of PEI/MCM-41 sorbents were optimized using molecular dynamics (MD), and the CO2 adsorption thermodynamics at varied PEI loadings was simulated using Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) method. Results showed a good agreement between experiments and simulation. On the surface of the MCM-41, there are high CO2-philic sites for CO2 adsorption, which were firstly covered by PEI molecular. The functionalization groups increased the interactions of the CO2 with more PEI molecular deployed on the surface of the MCM-41, then to the center of the pore. The adsorption performance of the composite sorbents depended on the adsorption cites and the space for CO2 diffusion. The CO2 adsorption thermodynamics and mechanisms at varied PEI loadings shed lights on tuning CO2 capture performance with amine-functionalized sorbents for power plant greenhouse gas control. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据