4.8 Article

Survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) using Drug Eluting Beads. Implications for clinical practice and trial design

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 56, 期 6, 页码 1330-1335

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.01.008

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Chemoembolization; Drug eluting beads (DEB); Safety; Survival

资金

  1. Sumitomo
  2. Pharmexa
  3. Eisai
  4. Biocompatibles
  5. Biolliance
  6. Bayer Schering
  7. Lilly
  8. Novartis
  9. Arqule
  10. Angiodynamics
  11. Kowa
  12. Imclone
  13. Bayer Pharmaceutical
  14. Bristol Myers Squibb
  15. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI 08/0146, FI09/00510]
  16. BBVA foundation
  17. University of Barcelona [APIF RD63/2006]
  18. US National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [1R01DK076986-01]
  19. European Commission [259744]
  20. Spanish National Health Institute [SAF-2010-16055]
  21. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) improves survival of properly selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Drug eluting beads (DEB) provide a calibrated and homogenous procedure while increasing efficacy. Outcome data applying this technology is lacking, and this is instrumental for clinical decision-making and for trial design. We evaluated the survival of HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE following a strict selection (preserved liver function, absence of symptoms, extrahepatic spread or vascular invasion). Methods: We registered baseline characteristics, the development of treatment-related adverse events, and the overall survival of all HCC patients treated by DEB-TACE from February 2004 to June 2010. Results: One hundred and four patients were treated with DEB-TACE. All but one were cirrhotic, 62.5% HCV+, 95% Child-Pugh A, 41 BCLC-A and 63 BCLC-B. Causes of DEB-TACE treatment in BCLC-A patients were: 35 unfeasible ablation, and six post-treatment recurrences. After a median follow-up of 24.5 months, 38 patients had died, two patients had received transplantation and 24 had received sorafenib because of untreatable tumour progression. Median survival of the cohort was 48.6 months (95% CI: 36.9-61.2), while it was 54.2 months in BCLC stage A and 47.7 months in stage B. Median survival after censoring follow-up at time of transplant/sorafenib was 47.7 (95% CI: 37.9-57.5) months. Conclusions: These data validate the safety of DEB-TACE and show that the survival expectancy applying current selection criteria and technique is better than that previously reported. A 50% survival at 4 years should be considered when suggesting treatment for patients fitting into controversial scenarios such as expanded criteria for transplantation/resection for multifocal HCC. (C) 2012 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据