4.1 Article

Pilot Study: Effect of Age on Visual Acuity with Defocus and Astigmatism

期刊

OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE
卷 92, 期 3, 页码 267-271

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000459

关键词

age; astigmatism; defocus; visual acuity

资金

  1. ARC Linkage Grant [LP100100575]
  2. Research Division of Carl Zeiss Vision
  3. Australian Research Council [LP100100575] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. To investigate how distance visual acuity in the presence of defocus and astigmatism is affected by age and whether aberration properties of young and older eyes can explain any differences. Methods. Participants were 12 young adults (mean [+/- SD] age, 23 [+/- 2] years) and 10 older adults (mean [+/- SD] age, 57 [+/- 4] years). Cyclopleged right eyes were used with 4-mm effective pupil sizes. Thirteen blur conditions were used by adding five spherical lens conditions (-1.00 diopters [D], -0.50 D, plano/0.00 D, +0.50 D, and +1.00 D) and adding two crosscylindrical lenses (+0.50 DS/-1.00 DC and +1.00 D/-2.00 DC, or 0.50 D and 1.00 D astigmatism) at four negative cylinder axes (45, 90, 135, and 180 degrees). Targets were single lines of high-contrast letters based on the Bailey-Lovie chart. Successively smaller lines were read until a participant could no longer read any of the letters correctly. Aberrations were measured with a COAS-HD Hartmann-Shack aberrometer. Results. There were no significant differences between the two age groups. We estimated that 70 to 80 participants per group would be needed to show significant effects of the trend of greater visual acuity loss for the young group. Visual acuity loss for astigmatism was twice that for defocus of the same magnitude of blur strength (0.33 logMAR [logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution]/D compared with 0.18 logMAR/D), contrary to the geometric prediction of similar loss. Conclusions. Any age-related differences in visual acuity in the presence of defocus and astigmatism were swamped by interparticipant variation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据