4.8 Article

Pharmacological inhibition of Frizzled-7 displays anti-tumor properties in hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 288-299

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.06.033

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Frizzled; Dishevelled; Targeted therapy

资金

  1. CLARA
  2. ARC [3676]
  3. EZUS Lyon
  4. Association Francaise de l'Etude du Foie (AFEF
  5. INSERM
  6. Institut National de la Sante Et de la Recherche Medicate (INSERM)
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: We previously reported the frequent overexpression of the FZD7 membrane receptor in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its role for controlling cancer phenotype. Herein, this study aimed at assessing the anticancer properties of compounds inhibiting FZD7 activity by disrupting its binding with the cytosolic Dishevelled (DVL) adaptator. Methods: We have designed small interfering peptides (RHPDs) that are able to enter within cells and to competitively antagonize the binding of FZD7 to the PDZ domain of DVL. Their antineoplastic properties were assessed in vitro on a panel of human HCC cell lines and in vivo on the SV40-TAg transgenic mouse model of HCC. Results: We have shown that RHPDs decrease cell viability via apoptosis depending on their affinity for PDZ, with a therapeutic index between cancerous and non-cancerous cells. RHPD properties were linked to beta-catenin degradation and PKC delta. activation. In transgenic mice, intra-tumor injection of RHPDs inhibited HCC progression. Conclusions: We have completed a proof-of-concept showing that in vitro and in vivo the pharmacological inhibition of FZD7 displays anti-cancerous properties against HCC. The mechanisms can involve beta-catenin and PKC delta modulations. Further studies are warranted to design protocols showing the compatibility with systemic in vivo applications. (C) 2010 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据