4.8 Article

Intramuscular transplantation of engineered hepatic tissue constructs corrects acute and chronic liver failure in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 52, 期 2, 页码 211-219

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.11.019

关键词

Hepatocytes; SAPNF; Extracellular matrix; Hepatocyte transplantation; Acute liver failure; Chronic liver failure; Hepatic tissue engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Transplantation of isolated hepatocytes holds great promise as ail alternative to whole organ liver transplantation. For treatment of liver failure, access to the portal circulation has significant risks and intrahepatic hepatocyte engraftment is poor. In advanced cirrhosis, transplantation into ail extrahepatic site is necessary and intrasplenic engraftment is short-lived. Strategies that allow repeated extrahepatic infusion of hepatocytes Could improve the efficacy and safety of hepatocyte transplantation for the treatment of liver failure. Methods: A non-immunogenic self-assembling peptide nanofiber (SAPNF) was developed as a three-dimensional scaffold and combined with growth factors derived from a conditionally immortalized human hepatocyte cell line to engineer a hepatic tissue graft that Would allow hepatocyte engraftment outside the liver. Results:The hepatic tissue Constructs maintained hepatocyte-specific gene expression and functionality in vitro. When transplanted into skeletal muscle as ail extrahepatic site for engraftment, the engineered hepatic grafts provided life-saving support in models of acute, fulminant, and chronic liver failure that recapitulates these clinical diseases. Conclusions: SAPNF-engineered hepatic Constructs engrafted and functioned as hepatic tissues within the muscle to provide life-sustaining liver Support. These engineered tissue Constructs contained no animal products that Would limit their development as a therapeutic approach. (C) 2010 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据