4.8 Review

The quest for liver progenitor cells: A practical point of view

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 117-129

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.10.009

关键词

Liver progenitor cells; Oval cells; Liver regeneration; Liver injury; Stein cells

资金

  1. Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
  2. Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (FWO-V) [G.0229.08, G.0651.06]
  3. BELSPO [IUAP-V1, P6/36]
  4. Brussels region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many chronic liver diseases can lead to hepatic dysfunction with organ failure. At present, orthotopic liver transplantation represents the benchmark therapy of terminal liver disease. However this practice is limited by shortage of donor grafts, the need for lifelong immunosuppression and very demanding state-of-the-art surgery. For this reason, new therapies have been developed to restore liver function, primarily in the form of hepatocyte transplantation and artificial liver support devices. While already offered in very specialized centers, both of these modalities still remain experimental. Recently, liver progenitor cells have shown great promise for cell therapy, and consequently they have attracted a lot of attention as an alternative or supportive tool for liver transplantation. These liver progenitor cells are quiescent in the healthy liver and become activated in certain liver diseases in which the regenerative capacity of mature hepatocytes and/or cholangiocytes is impaired. Although reports describing liver progenitor cells are numerous, they have not led to a consensus on the identity of the liver progenitor cell. In this review, we will discuss some of the characteristics of these cells and the different ways that have been used to obtain these from rodents. We will also highlight the challenges that researchers are facing in their quest to identify and use liver progenitor cells. (C) 2009 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据