4.8 Article

HCV replication suppresses cellular glucose uptake through down-regulation of cell surface expression of glucose transporters

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 883-894

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.12.029

关键词

Diabetes mellitus; Down-regulation; Glucose uptake; GLUT1; GLUT2; Hepatitis C virus; Hepatocyte; Interferon; Replicon

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Persistent infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes extrahepatic diseases, including diabetes. We investigated the possible effect(s) of HCV replication on cellular glucose uptake and expression of the facilitative glucose transporter (GLUT) 2 and 1. Methods: We used Huh-7.5 cells harboring either an HCV subgenomic RNA replicon (SGR) or an HCV full-genomic RNA replicon (FGR), HCV-infected cells, and the respective cells treated with interferon (1FN). We also used liver tissue samples obtained from patients with or without HCV infection. Results:Glucose uptake and surface expression of GLUT2 and GLUT1 were suppressed in SGR, FGR and HCV-infected cells compared to the control cells. Expression levels of GLUT2 mRNA, but not GLUT1 mRNA, were lower in SGR, FGR and HCV-infected cells than in the control. Luciferase reporter assay demonstrated decreased GLUT2 promoter activities in SGR, FGR and HCV-infected cells. IFN treatment restored glucose uptake, GLUT2 surface expression, GLUT2 mRNA expression and GLUT2 promoter activities. Also, GLUT2 expression was reduced in hepatocytes of liver tissues obtained from HCV-infected patients. Conclusions: HCV replication down-regulates cell surface expression of GLUT2 partly at the transcriptional level, and possibly at the intracellular trafficking level as suggested for GLUT1, thereby lowering glucose uptake by hepatocytes. (c) 2009 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据