4.8 Article

Increased intratumoral IL-17-producing cells survival in hepatocellular carcinoma correlate with poor patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 980-989

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.12.033

关键词

Th17 cells; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Prognosis; Angiogenesis; Inflammation

资金

  1. NSFC, China [30425025, 30730086, 30872372]
  2. 973 Program [2004CB518801, 2007CB512404]
  3. The Ministry of Health of PR China [2008ZX10002-019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: To characterize IL-17-producing cells, a newly defined T helper cell subset with potent pro-inflammatory properties, in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to determine their prognostic values. Methods: One hundred and seventy-eight HCC patients were enrolled randomly. Distribution and phenotypic features of IL-17-producing cells were determined by flow cytometry and/or immunohistochemistry. Results: Compared with corresponding non-tumor regions, the levels of Th17 cells were significantly increased in tumors of HCC patients (P < 0.001). Most intratumoral Th17 cells exhibited an effector memory phenotype with increased expression of CCR4 and CCR6. Intratumoral IL-17-producing cell density was associated with overall survival (OS, P = 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS, P = 0.001) in HCC patients. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that intratumoral IL-17-producing cell density was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.351, P = 0.009) and DFS (HR = 2.256, P = 0.002). Moreover, the levels of intratumoral Th17 cells were positively correlated with microvessel density in tumors (r = 0.616, P = 0.001). Conclusion: Accumulation of intratumoral IL-17-producing cells may promote tumor progression through fostering angiogenesis, and intratumoral IL-17-producing cell could serve as a potential prognostic marker and a novel therapeutic target for HCC. (C) 2009 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据