4.8 Article

Sonic hedgehog is an autocrine viability factor for myofibroblastic hepatic stellate cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 98-106

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.07.032

关键词

hepatic stellate cells; sonic hedgehog; AKT; PDGF

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM [R01AA010154] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAAA NIH HHS [R01 AA010154, 5R01AA010154, R01 AA010154-11] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Factors released during liver injury, such as platelet derived growth factor-BB (PDGF), promote accumulation of myofibroblastic hepatic stellate cells (MFB) that drive the pathogenesis of cirrhosis. The hedgehog (Hh) pathway regulates remodeling of other injured tissues. This study evaluates the hypothesis that autocrine production of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) promotes MFB growth. Methods: Primary rat hepatic stellate cells (HSC) were treated without or with PDGF, a pharmacologic inhibitor of PDGF-regulated kinases, adenovirus expressing activated or dominant negative AKT, or Hh signaling inhibitors. Shh production, expression of Hh inhibitors and target genes, and HSC growth were assessed. Results: HSC expressed Shh, Hh pathway components, and the Hh inhibitor, Hip. During culture Hip expression fell, Shh production increased, and Hh target gene expression was induced. Neutralizing Shh antibodies promoted apoptosis. Adding PDGF increased Shh expression and MFB growth. Both processes followed activation of AKT and were abrogated by AKT inhibitors. Adenoviral delivery of activated AKT up-regulated Shh expression, demonstrating a direct role for AKT in regulating Shh expression. Shh-neutralizing antibodies and other Hh pathway inhibitors blocked the mitogenic effects of PDGF. Conclusions: These results identify Shh as an autocrine growth factor for MFB and suggest a role for Hh signaling in the pathogenesis of cirrhosis. (c) 2007 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据