4.8 Article

Fructose consumption as a risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 993-999

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.02.011

关键词

hepatic steatosis; fructose; soft drinks; uric acid; fatty liver; non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-68607, R01 HL068607] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [K23 DK062116-01A2, DK-52121, DK-79352, R01 DK052121, K23 DK062116] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: While the rise in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) parallels the increase in obesity and diabetes, a significant increase in dietary fructose consumption in industrialized countries has also occurred. The increased consumption of high fructose corn syrup, primarily in the form of soft drinks, is linked with complications of the insulin resistance syndrome. Furthermore, the hepatic metabolism of fructose favors de novo lipogenesis and ATP depletion. We hypothesize that increased fructose consumption contributes to the development of NAFLD. Methods: A dietary history and paired serum and liver tissue were obtained from patients with evidence of biopsy-proven NAFLD (n = 49) without cirrhosis and controls (n = 24) matched for gender, age (5 years), and body mass index (3 points). Results: Consumption of fructose in patients with NAFLD was nearly 2- to 3-fold higher than controls [365 kcal vs 170 kcal (p < 0.05)]. In patients with NAFLD (n = 6), hepatic mRNA expression of fructokinase (KHK), an important enzyme for fructose metabolism, and fatty acid synthase, an important enzyme for lipogenesis were increased (P = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively). In an AML hepatocyte cell line, fructose resulted in dose-dependent increase in KHK protein and activity. Conclusions:The pathogenic mechanism underlying the development of NAFLD may be associated with excessive dietary fructose consumption. (c) 2008 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据