4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Prediction and Measurement of Thermal Transport Across Interfaces Between Isotropic Solids and Graphitic Materials

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4004932

关键词

pump-probe thermoreflectance; thermal boundary conductance; graphite; diffuse mismatch model; anisotropy

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research through MURI [N00014-07-1-0723]
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-09-1-0245]
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. LDRD program office through the Sandia National Laboratories
  5. United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the high intrinsic thermal conductivity of carbon allotropes, there have been many attempts to incorporate such structures into existing thermal abatement technologies. In particular, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphitic materials (i.e., graphite and graphene flakes or stacks) have garnered much interest due to the combination of both their thermal and mechanical properties. However, the introduction of these carbon-based nanostructures into thermal abatement technologies greatly increases the number of interfaces per unit length within the resulting composite systems. Consequently, thermal transport in these systems is governed as much by the interfaces between the constituent materials as it is by the materials themselves. This paper reports the behavior of phononic thermal transport across interfaces between isotropic thin films and graphite substrates. Elastic and inelastic diffusive transport models are formulated to aid in the prediction of conductance at a metal-graphite interface. The temperature dependence of the thermal conductance at Au-graphite interfaces is measured via transient thermoreflectance from 78 to 400 K. It is found that different substrate surface preparations prior to thin film deposition have a significant effect on the conductance of the interface between film and substrate. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4004932]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据