4.5 Article

Kinetics of lactate metabolism during acellular normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 1312-1319

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.07.014

关键词

ex vivo lung perfusion; lung transplant; lactate metabolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Plasma lactate has been used as a marker of poor prognosis in clinical conditions. However, the relationship between lactate production and lung function during acellular normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is unclear. We investigated the kinetics of lactate metabolism during EVLP and the correlation of this marker with outcomes after transplant. METHODS: Human donor lungs in our clinical EVLP trial (CLs; n = 28) and rejected donor lungs for experimental use (Els; n = 8) were perfused ex vivo using the Toronto technique. Lactate level, lactate/pyruvate (L/P) ratio, and glucose level in the perfusate were measured. In CLs, we examined the relationship between lactate metabolism during EVLP and early post-transplant outcomes. The hypoxia-inducible factor 1 sub-unit 1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) level in lung tissue was examined in ELs. RESULTS: We performed double-lung EVLP in CLs and single-lung EVLP in ELs. In CLs, the lactate and L/P ratios at the end of EVLP had no correlation with early post-transplant outcomes despite lactate elevation during EVLP. Although lactate elevation was also present in all ELs, we were able to identify 2 groups based on L/P ratio at the end of EVLP. The group with the high LIP ratio had higher airway pressure during EVLP and higher HIF-1 alpha in lung tissue at the end of EVLP. CONCLUSIONS: Lactate increases seen in the EVLP perfusate most often represent physiologic lactate production by the lung in a setting with reduced lactate clearance. Thus, patients who underwent transplantation after EVLP had good outcomes despite lactate elevation during EVLP. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011;30:1312-9 (C) 2011 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据