4.3 Article

Long-Term Survival After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Population-Based Analysis Controlled for Nonhead Trauma

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 E1-E8

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e318280d3e6

关键词

epidemiology; risk; mortality; rehabilitation

资金

  1. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research [H133A020507, H133A070013]
  2. National Institute of Health [HD-07447]
  3. Rochester Epidemiology Project (from the National Institute on Aging) [R01 AG034676]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the contribution of cooccurring nonhead injuries to hazard of death after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants: A random sample of Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with confirmed TBI from 1987 through 1999 was identified. Design: Each case was assigned an age- and sex-matched, non-TBI regular control from the population. For special cases with accompanying nonhead injuries, 2 matched special controls with nonhead injuries of similar severity were assigned. Measures: Vital status was followed from baseline (ie, injury date for cases, comparable dates for controls) through 2008. Cases were compared first with regular controls and second with regular or special controls, depending on case type. Results: In total, 1257 cases were identified (including 221 special cases). For both cases versus regular controls and cases versus regular or special controls, the hazard ratio was increased from baseline to 6 months (10.82 [2.86-40.89] and 7.13 [3.10-16.39], respectively) and from baseline through study end (2.92 [1.74-4.91] and 1.48 [1.09-2.02], respectively). Among 6-month survivors, the hazard ratio was increased for cases versus regular controls (1.43 [1.06-2.15]) but not for cases versus regular or special controls (1.05 [0.80-1.38]). Conclusions: Among 6-month survivors, accounting for nonhead injuries resulted in a nonsignificant effect of TBI on long-term mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据