4.7 Article

Fire safety enhancement of a highly efficient flame retardant poly (phenylphosphoryl phenylenediamine) in biodegradable poly(lactic acid)

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 363, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.090

关键词

Biodegradable material; Poly(lactic acid); Phosphorous-nitrogen containing flame retardant; Fire safety; Flame retardant mechanism

资金

  1. Shandong Province Key Research and Development Plan of China (Public Welfare Project) [2017GGX20135]
  2. Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation of China [2016ZRBM17]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21104038, 51773104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flame-retarded poly(lactic acid) (PLA) biodegradable materials are viewed as promising as sustainable alternatives to petroleum-based commodity polymers. A new highly efficient flame retardant, poly(phenylphosphoryl phenylenediamine) (PPDA), was synthesized by the condensation of phenylphosphoryl dichloride with p-phenylenediamine and its structure was confirmed by H-1 nulear magnetic resonance and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. When 3 wt% PPDA was incorporated into PLA, the limited oxygen index increased from 20.0% of neat PLA to 25.5% and its UL-94 vertical burning testing achieved V-0 rating. Moreover, the total heat release and peak heat release rate values of PLA/3 wt% PPDA material were decreased from 109.1 MJ/m(2) and 643.7 kW/m(2) of PLA to 98.3 MJ/m(2) and 570.0 kW/m(2), respectively, and the fire performance index increased from 0.081 of PLA to 0.132 m(2) s/kW. The high fire safety of PPDA in PLA is mainly attributed to the combined effects of the phosphorous-containing radical inhibition and inert gases and the barrier action of the formed char layer. The addition of less than 3 wt% PPDA has little influence on the tensile and impact properties of PLA. The flame retardant PLA blends have great application potential in electrical casing, automobile interiors and three-dimensional printing materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据