4.7 Article

Spectrophotometric analysis of phenols, which involves a hemin-graphene hybrid nanoparticles with peroxidase-like activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 60-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.006

关键词

Phenols; Hemin; Graphene; Benzodiazepines; Spectrophotometry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-21065007]
  2. Education Department Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [GJJ10037]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology of Nanchang University [SKLF-ZZA-201302, SKLF-ZZB-201303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phenols are well known noxious compounds, which are often found in various water sources. A novel analytical method has been researched and developed based on the properties of hemin-graphene hybrid nanosheets (H-GNs). These nanosheets were synthesized using a wet-chemical method, and they have peroxidase-like activity. Also, in the presence of H2O2, the nanosheets are efficient catalysts for the oxidation of the substrate, 4-aminoantipine (4-AP), and the phenols. The products of such an oxidation reaction are the colored quinone-imines (benzodiazepines). Importantly, these products enabled the differentiation of the three common phenols - pyrocatechol, resorcin and hydroquinone, with the use of a novel, spectroscopic method, which was developed for the simultaneous determination of the above three analytes. This spectroscopic method produced linear calibrations for the pyrocatechol (0.4-4.0 mg L-1), resorcin (0.2-2.0 mg L-1) and hydroquinone (0.8-8.0 mg L-1) analytes. In addition, kinetic and spectral data, obtained from the formation of the colored benzodiazepines, were used to establish multi-variate calibrations for the prediction of the three phenol analytes found in various kinds of water; partial least squares (PLS), principal component regression (PCR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models were used and the PLS model performed best. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据