4.7 Article

Unveiling formation mechanism of carcinogenic N-nitrosodimethylamine in ozonation of dimethylamine: A density functional theoretical investigation

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 279, 期 -, 页码 330-335

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.078

关键词

N-nitrosodimethylamine; Ozonation; Dimethylamine; Hydroxylamine; Density functional theory

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development of China [2013AA06A305]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013T60128]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies found that ozonation of organic pollutants with dimethylamino groups produces N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) that is highly carcinogenic to humans. However, the formation mechanism of NDMA remains inexplicit, and previously proposed mechanisms are inconsistent with experimental observations. In this study, the formation mechanism of NDMA in ozonation was explored by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, with dimethylamine (DMA) as a model compound. By calculating Gibbs energies and energy barriers, formation of NDMA in ozonation of DMA was observed to proceed through a hydroxylamine mechanism. The calculation results show that hydroxylamine is generated through DMA reacting with hydroxyl radicals (HO center dot) formed from hydrolysis of ozone. DMA reacting with hydroxylamine can produce unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH), a well-known NDMA precursor. Transformation of UDMH to NDMA is mainly induced by ozone or HO center dot rather than dissolved oxygen proposed previously. The reaction of DMA and hydroxylamine is pH dependent, with energy barriers increasing from neutral pH to the second pK(a) of hydroxylamine and then decreasing. This is in accordance with the experimentally observed pH dependence of NDMA yield in ozonation, indicating that the hydroxylamine mechanism is responsible for the NDMA formation in ozonation. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据