4.7 Article

Facile and highly efficient removal of trace Gd(III) by adsorption of colloidal graphene oxide suspensions sealed in dialysis bag

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 279, 期 -, 页码 546-553

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.075

关键词

Graphene oxide; Colloidal suspension; Gd(III) removal; Dialysis bag; Second-pollution

资金

  1. Project in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program of China [2012BAE01B02]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21061011]
  3. Jiangxi Provincial Scientific & Technological Support Project of China [20132BBE50004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile, highly efficient and second-pollution-free strategy to remove trace Gd(III) from aqueous solutions by adsorption of colloidal graphene oxide (GO) suspensions in dialysis bag has been developed. The effects of pH, ionic strength and temperature on Gd(III) adsorption, and the pH-dependent desorption were investigated. The maximum adsorption capacity of Gd(III)on GO at pH = 5.9 +/- 0.1 and T=303 K was 286.86 mg g(-1), higher than any other currently reported. The Gd(III)-saturated GO suspension could resume colloidal state in 0.1 M HNO3 with desorption rate of 85.00% in the fifth adsorption-desorption cycle. Gd(III) adsorption rate on GO was dependent more on pH and ionic strength than on temperature. The abundant oxygen-containing functional groups such as carboxyl and hydroxyl played a vital role on adsorption. The thermodynamics and kinetics investigations revealed that the adsorption of Gd(III) on GO was an endothermic, spontaneous and monolayer absorption process, which well fitted the pseudo-second-order model. GO could be a promising adsorbent applied in the enrichment and removal of lanthanides from aqueous solutions. More significantly, the combination of colloidal GO suspension with dialysis membrane facilely solves the re-pollution of the treated solutions due to the great difficulties in separation and recovery of GO. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据