4.7 Article

Bioremediation of chlorimuron-ethyl-contaminated soil by Hansschlegelia sp strain CHL1 and the changes of indigenous microbial population and N-cycling function genes during the bioremediation process

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 314-321

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.011

关键词

Chlorimuron-ethyl; Bioremediation; Hansschlegelia sp; N-cycling functional gene

资金

  1. National High Technology and Development Program (863 Program) of China [2012AA101403]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41071202, 41101221]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term and excessive application of the herbicide chlorimuron-ethyl has led to soil degradation and crop rotation barriers. In the current study, we isolated bacterial strain Hansschlegelia sp. CHL1, which can utilize chlorimuron-ethyl as its sole carbon and energy source, and investigated its application in soil bioremediation. Indigenous microbial populations and N-cycling function in the soil were also investigated during the bioremediation process by monitoring the copy numbers of bacterial and fungal marker genes, as well as N-cycling functional genes (nifH, amoA, nirS, and nirK). Results showed that >95% of chlorimuron-ethyl could be degraded within 45 days in soils inoculated with CHL1. Inoculation at two time points resulted in a higher remediation efficiency and longer survival time than a single inoculation. At the end of the 60-day incubation, the copy numbers of most indicator genes were recovered to the level of the control, even in the single-inoculation soils. A double inoculation was necessary for recovery of nifH. However, the abundance of nirK and ammonia-oxidizing bacterial genes were significantly inhibited regardless of inoculum. The results suggested that CHL1 is effective for the remediation of chlorimuron-ethyl-contaminated soil, and could partially reduce the toxic effects of chlorimuron-ethyl on soil microorganisms. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据