4.7 Article

Successful bioremediation of an aged and heavily contaminated soil using a microbial/plant combination strategy

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 264, 期 -, 页码 430-438

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.071

关键词

Aged and heavily contaminated soil; Bioremediation; Community structure; Ecological assessment; Pyrosequencing

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX2-YW-L08]
  2. Beijing Academy of Science Technology [IE012009610019-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioremediation of an aged and heavily contaminated soil was performed using microbial remediation, phytoremediation, and microbial/phytoremediation. The removal efficiency of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was in the order microbial/phytoremediation > microbial remediation approximate to phytoremediation > control. The removal percentage of microbial/phytoremediation (69.6%) was twice that of control. Kocuria sp. P10 significantly enhanced PAH removal (P < 0.05) and ryegrass growth (P < 0.01). Dehydrogenase activity increased steadily and was negatively correlated with total PAH content. Successional changes in soil microbial communities were also detected by pyrosequencing. The results indicated that biodiversity of the soil bacterial community gradually increased with time and was slightly lower in control, as indicated by operational taxonomic unit (OTU) numbers and Shannon-Wiener indices. Proportions of Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria were consistently high in all groups. Actinobacteridae were initially predominant (>37.8%) but rapidly decreased to <4%. The proportions of Acidobacteria increased greatly and this increase was positively correlated with PAH removal. These findings indicate a healthy ecological progression and a role of Acidobacteria as an indicator of the process. This study provides new insights into the dynamics of community structure during bioremediation process and a possible basis for ecological assessment for bioremediation on a large scale. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据