4.7 Article

Tourmaline combined with Phanerochaete chrysosporium to remediate agricultural soil contaminated with PAHs and OCPs

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 264, 期 -, 页码 439-448

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.073

关键词

Tourmaline; Remediation; PAHs and OCPs; Soil humic acid; Soil enzyme activities; PCR-DGGE bacterial diversity

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2014CB441104]
  2. Tianjin Key Programme of Basic Research [13JCYBJC20200, 10JCZDJC24200]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [2090702, 441225014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential application on tourmaline was explored. The combination of tourmaline and Phanerochaete chrysosporium was conducted to remediate the field soil from the Dagu Drainage River bank of Tianjin in China. The total PAH and OCP concentrations in the soil were 6.4 +/- 0.05 and 145.9 +/- 1.9 mg/kg, respectively. During the 60 day remediation program, the remediation degradation rates of all the 16 U.S. EPA priority PAHs and OCPs were 53.2 +/- 4.7% and 43.5 +/- 3.1%, respectively. The PAH and OCP removal rates were 31.9 +/- 2.9% and 26.4 +/- 1.8%, respectively, in soil with the addition of tourmaline, and the removal rates were 40.5 +/- 23% and 34.2 +/- 3.9%, respectively, in soil with the addition of P. chrysosporium. Thus, the combination of tourmaline and P. chrysosporium promoted the bioremediation rate of PAHs and OCPs in the soil, compared with the rates obtained using tourmaline or P. chrysosporium individually for the remediation of PAH and OCP degradation. In addition, tourmaline can promote the generation of soil hydrogen peroxidase and invertase enzyme, significantly increase the indigenous bacterial community and the number of PAH and OCP-degraders compared to those in the control, and reduce the soil humic acid content. Hence, the present study provides a potential alternative for the remediation of soils contaminated by PAHs and OCPs. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据