4.7 Article

Arsenate and cadmium co-adsorption and co-precipitation on goethite

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 55-63

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.030

关键词

Arsenate; Cadmium; Goethite; Adsorption; Precipitation

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB441102]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [R5110004]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40973065, 41023005]
  4. Independent Innovation Foundation of Shandong University [2011TB021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arsenate (As(V), AsO43-) and cadmium (Cd) are among the toxic elements of most concern. Their sorption behaviors on goethite were studied by batch experiments (pH edges, isotherms and kinetics) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Arsenic coordination environment was explored by X-ray absorbance fine structure (EXAFS) analysis. Sorption isotherms of both As(V) and Cd on goethite could be divided into the adsorption-dominated and precipitation-dominated parts, while their sorption showed different pH-dependency and sorption reversibility. Cadmium adsorption was enhanced in the presence of AsO43-, which could be explained by the decrease in the electrostatic potential due to the sorption of AsO43- and the formation of a ternary Cd-As(V)-goethite complex. Based on the EXAFS study, AsO43- adsorbed on goethite mainly formed bidentate-binuclear complex. The high loadings of Cd changed the As(V)-Fe distance and its coordination number. However, Cd did not affect the As(V) adsorption amount in the adsorption-dominated region. When As(V) and Cd formed co-precipitates, their sorption amounts were both increased. The formation of co-precipitates decreased the mobility of Cd but increased the mobility of As(V) because less As(V) was sorbed on goethite through surface complexation. This study will provide better understandings on As(V) and Cd transport and useful information on their remediation strategies. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据