4.7 Article

Heterogeneous activation of Oxone by CoxFe3-xO4 nanocatalysts for degradation of rhodamine B

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 736-742

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.005

关键词

Rhodamine B; Sulfate radicals; COxFe3-xO4 nanoparticles; Oxone; Degradation rate

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program 863 [2012AA061705]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of China [2009ZX07212-003]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [40672158]
  4. Scientific Research Reward Fund for Excellent Young and Middle-Aged Scientists of Shandong Province [2008BS09019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The removal of Rhodamine B (RhB) by CoxFe3-xO4 magnetic nanoparticles activated Oxone has been performed in this study. A series of CoxFe3-xO4 nanoparticles was synthesized using a hydrothermal method. The synthetic CoxFe3-xO4 nanoparticles were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results showed that they were spinel structures and Co was introduced into their structures. The performances of CoxFe3-xO4 nanocatalysts on the activation of Oxone for removal of RhB were investigated and we found that the higher cobalt content in the catalyst, the better removal performance was resulted. A series experiments of reaction conditions were also performed, which confirmed that weak acidic, higher temperature, higher dosages of CoxFe3-xO4 nanocatalyst and Oxone and lower concentration of RhB were favored for the degradation of RhB. The pseudo-first order kinetics was observed to fit the CoxFe3-xO4/Oxone process. Furthermore, the reaction mechanism was discussed and the scavenging effect was examined by using phenol and tert-butyl alcohol which indicated that sulfate radicals were the dominating reactive species responsible for the degradation process. Finally, the stability of CoxFe3-xO4 nanocatalyst was studied. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据