4.7 Article

Relationships between PAHs and PCBs, and quantitative source apportionment of PAHs toxicity in sediments from Fenhe reservoir and watershed

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 248, 期 -, 页码 89-96

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.12.054

关键词

Relationship between PAHs and PCBs; Source apportionment of toxicity; PMF

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21207070]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Combined Laboratory of the Tianjin Meteorological Bureau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sedimentary samples from 28 sites throughout the Fenhe reservoir and upstream watershed in China were measured, to study the relationships between PAHs and PCBs as well as perform quantitative source apportionment of toxicity. The distributions of 16PAHs and 123PCBs showed high correlation. The C-7-PAHs (total concentrations of seven carcinogenic PAHs) varied from 87.7 to 2005.0 ngg(-1) dw, and the 6DL-PCBs (total concentrations of six dioxin-like PCB congeners) were n.d.-5.96 ng g(-1) dw. Toxicity and biological risk were assessed using toxic equivalent quantity (TEQ) and sediment quality guideline quotient (SQGQ). The BaP played the dominant role for TEQ(PAH) at most sites (37.17-89.40%), although the CHR showed the highest concentration level. PCB-81 contributed the highest TEQpcB. High correlations were observed between (16)PAHs and E7C-PAHs, (123)PCBs and 6DL-PCBs, C-7-PAHS and 6DL-PCBs as well as TEQ(PAH) and TEQ(PCB). Furthermore, quantitative source apportionments for PAHs concentrations and TEQ were carried out, combining the positive matrix factorization (PMF) with the formula of TEQ. For most sites, the vehicular sources were the largest contributors to TEQ(PAH) (46.58%), while coal combustion sources were the highest contributor for PAHs concentrations (43.31%). The relatively higher correlations between PCBs and contributions of coal combustion to PAHs might imply the similar distribution of industrial sources for PAHs and PCBs. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据